| Tassie Tricho ID | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
lewis avid contributor & moderator
Number of posts : 862 Location : Melbourne Registration date : 2008-05-07
| Subject: Tassie Tricho ID Mon Jan 12, 2009 5:53 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
prier
Number of posts : 107 Location : melbourne Registration date : 2008-04-04
| Subject: Re: Tassie Tricho ID Mon Jan 12, 2009 6:44 pm | |
| I agree, it looks like a variety of Echinopsis perviana. | |
|
| |
lewis avid contributor & moderator
Number of posts : 862 Location : Melbourne Registration date : 2008-05-07
| Subject: Re: Tassie Tricho ID Tue Jan 13, 2009 1:30 pm | |
| | |
|
| |
calycium Moderator
Number of posts : 416 Location : Adelaide, SA Registration date : 2008-04-06
| Subject: Re: Tassie Tricho ID Thu Jan 15, 2009 9:35 am | |
| I'm no expert but are peruvianus spines that long? I would have leaned towards a T.B. Sure someone with more skills will post soon. | |
|
| |
snopuppy13
Number of posts : 1 Location : new york Registration date : 2008-10-04
| Subject: Re: Tassie Tricho ID Sun Jan 25, 2009 4:46 pm | |
| i would go with peruvianus. the notches above the areoles are pretty consistent with the species. as far as spine length,it's variable, i have a couple with spines up to 2". | |
|
| |
gilligan
Number of posts : 133 Location : Perth Registration date : 2008-09-05
| Subject: Re: Tassie Tricho ID Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:08 pm | |
| Could well be peruvianus, but don't discount macrogonus or cuzcoensis... A lot of it has to do with the colour of the spines, (yup, they are that long) and what they stay as when they are old... I'm thinkning peruv due to them staying brown in the lower regions.
Macro/cuzco usually turn whitish, but with similar spines... | |
|
| |
lewis avid contributor & moderator
Number of posts : 862 Location : Melbourne Registration date : 2008-05-07
| Subject: Re: Tassie Tricho ID Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:46 pm | |
| I'm going to go with E.peruviana for now, unless someone can prove otherwise. | |
|
| |
Micromegas
Number of posts : 16 Location : Adelaide Registration date : 2008-04-29
| Subject: Re: Tassie Tricho ID Sun Feb 01, 2009 2:20 am | |
| That's a pretty unusual cactus there lewis, a little hard to narrow it down to a species with certainty. Peruvianus would be pretty close but trichs show a lot of variability, you can name them just about whatever you wish IMO. It's probably a hybrid. Very nice plant though. Nice and round with cool spination. | |
|
| |
prier
Number of posts : 107 Location : melbourne Registration date : 2008-04-04
| Subject: Re: Tassie Tricho ID Mon Feb 02, 2009 11:04 am | |
| There's enough confusion in regards to Trichos as it is. Why are we trying to makes things more complicated. That plant is obviously what a lot of people have in their collections labeled as either Trichocereus peruvianus or Echinopsis peruviana. It's blue, there's well defined ribs, the spines are longish. Without seeing the growth habit and flowers its hard to ID any better than we already have. | |
|
| |
trigonus Admin & Cactus Fiend
Number of posts : 879 Location : coastal NSW 1°C - 40°C Registration date : 2008-01-23
| Subject: Re: Tassie Tricho ID Mon Feb 02, 2009 1:47 pm | |
| Ah-hah! It has some black spines though! I am going out on a limb here and going to say it is somewhat close to T. glaucas At a glance I would definitely say peruv though. Could be bloody anything. It's a Tricho though, of that we can be certain. | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: Tassie Tricho ID | |
| |
|
| |
| Tassie Tricho ID | |
|